Safety on public transport
There have been reports of increasing incidents on public transport threatening the safety of both passengers and staff.
Extreme pornography is violent imagery intended to provoke sexual arousal. Amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill would create new offences in this category.
The law on extreme pornography (160KB PDF)
In August 2005, a joint Home Office and Scottish Executive (now Scottish Government) consultation sought views on whether to make it illegal to possess “extreme pornography” featuring adults. This was in response to increasing public concern about the availability of this type of material online.
Following the consultation, the Westminster and Scottish governments introduced legislation to criminalise the possession of extreme pornography.
It is an offence to possess an extreme pornographic image in England and Wales and Northern Ireland under section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.
An “extreme pornographic image” is an image which is both pornographic and extreme.
An image is “pornographic” if it is of “such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.”
An image is “extreme” if it is “grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character” and depicts “in an explicit and realistic way” any of the following:
The latter two categories of prohibited material were added through section 37 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. This followed criticism from academics and women’s groups that the 2008 act originally failed to make it an offence to possess “rape pornography”.
Section 65 of the 2008 act sets out general defences for someone charged with possessing an extreme pornographic image:
Regarding “rape pornography”, there is a defence for possessing an image where a person who is a participant in the image, as well as the possessor, can prove that, despite appearances, consent was given freely and by someone who had the capacity do so.
An additional defence for those participating in the creation of extreme pornography is given in section 66. A defendant must prove, on the balance of probabilities, that they directly participated in the act portrayed in the image and that the act did not inflict non-consensual harm on any person.
Where a defendant is accused of creating images depicting necrophilia (sexual intercourse with a corpse), they must also prove that the human corpse portrayed was not in fact a corpse.
Where a defendant is accused of creating images depicting bestiality, they cannot use the defence of proving they have not inflicted non-consensual harm.
In Scotland, section 51A of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, as amended by section 42 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010, makes it an offence to possess extreme pornographic images.
When introduced in 2010, the Scottish offence went further than Westminster legislation at the time, in that it also applied to obscene pornographic images realistically depicting rape or other non-consensual penetrative sexual activity, whether violent or otherwise. However, as explained above, UK legislation also criminalised such material following the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015.
The House of Lords has agreed amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill that would categorise two widespread types of pornographic content as extreme pornography:
The Crime and Policing Bill returns to the House of Commons for consideration of the Lords amendments on 14 April 2026.
The law on extreme pornography (160KB PDF)
There have been reports of increasing incidents on public transport threatening the safety of both passengers and staff.
The Online Safety Act 2023 aims to protect people from illegal and harmful content.
Supporters say a ban would help protect children online, but others argue it could have unintended consequences